文藻外語大學W-Portfolio

研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文

研究資料明細

論文名稱 運動博弈中賭盤與比賽得分之關係:以2017年美國職棒大聯盟為例
發表日期 2018-06-30
論文收錄分類 其他
所有作者 林忠程、陳膺成、 黃孆蔚
作者順序 第一作者
通訊作者
刊物名稱 大專體育
發表卷數
是否具有審稿制度
發表期數 145
期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 NATTWN-中華民國
發表年份 2018
發表月份 6
發表形式 紙本及電子期刊
所屬計劃案
可公開文檔  
可公開文檔  
可公開文檔  
附件 大專體育(145)_內文.pdf大專體育(145)_內文.pdf


[摘要] :
隨著運動博弈產業的發展,投注者關注各項運動賽事的統計資料與相關資訊。本文旨在分析2017年美國職棒大聯盟開出的總得分與實際比賽得分的關聯性,以2017年美國職棒大聯盟例行賽各隊得分大小盤結果數據等文獻進行分析,結果發現開大分盤最多的球隊是紐約大都會,開小分盤最多的球隊是匹茲堡海盜。總得分盤讓大小分盤盡量趨近於五成的平衡狀態,以獲取5%之經營利潤,30支球隊中有12支球隊大小分差率達5%,球隊投手防禦率與球隊得分也存在關聯性。結語指出運動博弈不僅是博弈,也是「投資管理」,運動賽事的分析不該單憑個人感覺與喜好,或聽閱坊間專家與媒體分析的迷思進行投注,而應全面觀察各項數據及趨勢,做一番有系統的分析與預測,尋找最有利的投注條件,做一正確的判斷抉擇,營造獲利的法則。

[英文摘要] :
As the sports Gambling has evolved, bettors to focus on statistical data analyses and related information. This study aims to analyze the correlation between odds in sports gambling and the actual score results by organizing the data of each team’s odds in Major League Baseball during the 2017 regular season. The results reveal that bookmakers set the most total overs on the the New York Mets, and the most total unders on the Pittsburgh Pirates. In order to protect their margin and generate a 5% operating profit, most bookmakers attempt to achieve a “balanced book” with fifty-fifty overall ratio between winners and losers as often as possible. Twelve of the thirty teams obtained a total differential rate of 5%. There is also a correlation found between each team’s earned run average and the betting odds. The results indicate that sports gambling is not only a game of chance but also an example of investment management. While analyzing sport games, bettors should not rely on personal perspectives, preferences, advice from other professional bettors or media analyses. They should observe and analyze the overall data and trends comprehensively and systematically to make predictions, identify the most profitable betting conditions and make accurate determinations. These are the key elements needs to systematically earn profits.

[參考文獻] :
參考文獻
全國法規資料庫(2016,11月16日)。運動彩券發行條例。資料引自http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0120050。
Laws & Regulations Database of the Republic of China. (2016, November 16). Sports
Lottery Issuance Act. Retrieved from http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0120050]
徐茂洲(2009)。臺灣運動彩券發展現況與發展性分析。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,8(2),230-238。doi:10.6169/NCYUJPEHR.8.2.24
[Hsu, M.-C. (2009). Development and analysis of Taiwan sports lottery. NCYU
Physical Education, Health & Recreation Journal, 8(2), 230-238. doi:10.6169/NCYUJPEHR.8.2.24]
程紹同、方信淵、洪嘉文、廖俊儒、謝一睿(2002)。運動管理學導論。臺北:華泰文化。
[Cheng, S.-T., Fang, E. S.-Y., Hung, C.-W., Liao, C.-J., & Hsieh, A. (2002). Introduction of sport management. Taipei, Taiwan: Hwa Tai.]
黃煜(2002)。美國職業運動產業發展趨勢分析。國民體育季刊,31(4),38-44。
[Huang. Y. (2002). The future of professional team sports in the U. S. National Sports Quarterly, 31(4), 38-44.]
楊正海(1999,10月9日)。跨國職棒簽賭單日賭金1.7億。臺灣時報,7版。
[Yang, C.-H. (1999, October 9). Transnational betting of NT$ 170 million for
Chinese Professional Baseball League game in a day. Taiwan Times, p. 7.]
Albert, J. and Bennett, J. (2001). Curve ball: Baseball, statistics, and the role of chance in the game. New York: Springer.
Broughton, D., Lee, J., & Nethery, R. (1999). Sports business at the end of the millennium: The answer: $213 Billion. Street & Smith’s Sport Business Journal, 2(35), 23-29.
Covers Media Group Ltd. (n.d.). MLB playoff statistic leaders. Retrieved from
https://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/mlb/statistics/2017/statistics_mlb_playoffs.html
Houser, A. (2005). Which Baseball Statistic Is the Most Important When Determining Team Success?. The Park Place Economist, 13(1), 29-36.
Jarvis, J. F. (2009). A Survey oh Baseball Player Performance Fvaluation Measures.
Retrieved January 1, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://knology.net/johnfjarvis/runs_survey.html.
Schwarz, A. (2004). The numbers game: Baseball’s lifelong fascination with statistics. New York, NY: Thomas Dune.
Yang, T. Y. and Swartz, T. (2004). A Two-Stage Bayesian Model for Predicting Winners in Major League Baseball. Journal of Data Science, 2 (1), 61-73.