研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | 語文與國際研究 |
| 發表日期 | 2021-06-30 |
| 論文收錄分類 | 其他 |
| 所有作者 | de Borja Navarro, & Yeh, A. |
| 作者順序 | 第二作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 是 |
| 刊物名稱 | 語文與國際研究 |
| 發表卷數 | Vol. 25 (Special Issue) |
| 是否具有審稿制度 | 否 |
| 發表期數 | |
| 期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 | NATTWN-中華民國 |
| 發表年份 | 2021 |
| 發表月份 | 6 |
| 發表形式 | 紙本及電子期刊 |
| 所屬計劃案 | n/a |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 | |
| 附件 |
w123-150.pdf
|
[摘要] :
西班牙報紙針對政府對抗新冠病毒的破碎措施之
論述實踐
Francisco de Borja Navarro* Aiden Yeh**
摘要
新型冠狀病毒 (COVID-19) 因其具有迅速傳播的能力與人傳人的傳染性，已成為全
球性問題，從而引發全世界失序。幾乎全球所有國家都未預料到COVID-19 對本國經
濟及公民的日常生活帶來的殘酷影響。西班牙是第一波受到COVID-19 嚴重影響的歐
洲國家之一，也是首先實施安全措施（如全國檢疫和單獨隔離）的國家之一。在全國
封鎖時期之後，西班牙政府開始進行四個階段的全國疫情降級行動，但顯然與該國主
要報紙發表觀點意見與社論，亦即支持和反對政府在疫情降級期間相關政策之有效性
相衝突。透過對西班牙兩家重要的報紙（El País 和El Mundo）使用的標籤及其語義、
語用含義進行基於語料庫的言談分析，本研究旨在調查報紙之論述實踐，以及不同的
政治意識形態如何影響其使用的標籤，反之亦然。語料庫數據是由400 篇文章內含
362,383 個憑證所組成，收集於2020 年5 月，對應西班牙政府宣布疫情降級的前15
天。研究者針對新聞報導進行了基於語料庫的調查，包括對詞彙的選擇和分類，以及
在新型冠狀病毒流行期間的報導重點。本文以社會認知方法 (Van Dijk, 2008) 作為理
論框架，研究結果顯示，兩家報紙都特別關注西班牙首都馬德里所面臨的政治分歧問
題：關於中央政府可靠程度令人質疑，以及中央政府在應對疫情二次爆發的準備程度。
此外，研究還發現El País 傾向於制肘西班牙政府的行動，而El Mundo 則更直接地報
導了其反對降級措施的立場。這種使用的標籤、評論和傳遞資訊的方式，在西班牙讓
民眾間產生了恐懼感，也失去了對政府的信賴感，因此民眾進一步拒絕了政府為預防、
控制和應對疫情而採取的政策及努力。這些事件導致社會和政治分裂，威脅到西班牙
公民的團結，強烈的負面情緒隨著一天天過去越發明顯。
[英文摘要] :
Discursive Practices of Spanish Newspapers Regarding
the Fragmented Government Measures in Battling
Coronavirus
Francisco de Borja Navarro* Aiden Yeh**
Abstract
The Coronavirus, known as COVID-19, has become a global problem due to its capacity to
spread rapidly and human-to-human contagion, provoking a world disorder. Almost every
country in the world was not expecting the brutal impact that COVID-19 brought into their
economy and the daily life of its citizens. Spain, one of the first European countries severely
affected by COVID-19, was also one of the frontrunners that led the implementation of
safety measures such as the national quarantine and at-home confinement. After its first
national lockdown, the Spanish Government started to carry out a national re-opening
divided in 4 phases, which apparently was confronted with a mixture of conflicting (re)views
published in leading newspapers, i.e., those who supported and those who were against the
measures adopted during reopening. By conducting a corpus-based discourse analysis of
various labels used and their semantic and pragmatic implications by two leading
newspapers (El País and El Mundo), this study aims to investigate their discursive practices
and how different political ideologies influence the labels they use, and vice versa. The
resulting corpus, which consists of 400 articles with 362,383 tokens in total, was created and
collected in May 2020, corresponding to the first fifteen days of Spain’s reopening. A corpusbased
investigation of media presentations of news which included the selection and
categorization of lexis and the focus of reporting during the coronavirus epidemic was
conducted. Taking a sociocognitive approach (Van Dijk, 2008) as the theoretical framework,
the results in this study show that both newspapers focused especially on the problems that
Madrid, the Spanish capital faced, i.e., political disagreements regarding the central
government’s questionable reliability and their readiness to confront the second wave of the
outbreak. Moreover, this study finds that El País showed a predisposition to victimize the
actions of the Spanish Government, while El Mundo is more direct with their news reporting
on disagreements over the reopening measures. The labels, comments and ways of delivering
information created a sense of fear among the Spanish citizens and loss of their trust, thus
further rejecting the government policies and efforts to prevent, control, and respond to the
pandemic. These events resulted in social and political fractures that threaten the unity of the
Spanish citizens while a strong negative sentiment is becoming more visible every day.
[參考文獻] :
Keywords: Coronavirus, reopening, Spanish government, newspaper, corpus discourse
analysis
