研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | Interdisciplinary Collaboration in General Education Course： Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship |
| 發表日期 | 2018-11-30 |
| 論文收錄分類 | 其他 |
| 所有作者 | Sheu, Huai Zhi; Lee, Hsueh-Chen |
| 作者順序 | 第一作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 是 |
| 刊物名稱 | 高雄文化研究2018年年刊 |
| 發表卷數 | Accepted |
| 是否具有審稿制度 | 是 |
| 發表期數 | Nov. 30, 2018 |
| 期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 | NATTWN-中華民國 |
| 發表年份 | 2018 |
| 發表月份 | 11 |
| 發表形式 | 紙本 |
| 所屬計劃案 | 無 |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
[摘要] :
近幾年來高等教育出現新的變化，彈性、開放且具特色之大學體制和學習環境，成為未來大學努力的方向。文藻外語大學通識教育中心於106學年度起，開設了社會創新與社會開創系列的微型課程，此課程是通識教育中心與本校專業科系國際企業管理系與英語暨國際學院合作，為跨系、跨院、跨領域的合作授課之微型系列彈性課程，分別是 1)社會創新與社會開創：公部門與私部門；2)社會創新與社會開創：非營利組織與社區部門；3)社會創新與社會開創：國際社會發展與趨勢。內容以社會創新與開創學科理論學習，實作工作坊，專題演講，以及社區關懷實作服務為主，期望提升學生自主學習，以擴大學生學習的經驗與場域。本研究旨在分享大學通識彈性課程以跨領域合作融入通識課程之實作的具體成果。研究以體驗式學習(experimental learning)替代傳統知識建構(knowledge-based learning) 授課方式，研究成果呈現如何在不同屬性的作業設計與教學活動中，透過量化的分析來呈現學生的學習成效。
[英文摘要] :
The emergence of innovative, flexible, and creative teaching transformation from traditional teaching method had been wildly adopted in the higher educational system in Taiwan as a trend. In 2017, Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages initiated a flexible series of courses in general education that integrates the teaching resources with the intention to lead an interdisciplinary collaboration between different schools and departments. The series of courses aim to provide students with self-learning and self-driven motivation instead of passive learning. Thus, the series courses are designed based on the mission of general education by choosing the theme of “social innovation and social entrepreneurship”. There are three courses embedded in this program: 1) Social innovation and Social entrepreneuring: public and private sectors, 2) Social innovation and Social entrepreneuring: Non-profit and Community sectors, 3) Social innovation and Social entrepreneuring: International sector and future development. It is an interdisciplinary curriculum that combines theoretical instruction, practical workshops, speeches of social entrepreneurs, and experiential leaning. This research, intends to focus on the flexibility and collaboration by leveraging the recourse to faculties through evaluating the synergy of students learning performance. We deliver the adjustments to teaching implementation based on the research finding either from quantitative aspect.
[參考文獻] :
1. Antonio Cartelli ed,Teaching in the knowledge society : new skills and instruments for teachers, Hershey, PA : Information Science Pub., c2006
2. Ball,Christopher; Huang, Kuo-Ting; Cotten, Shelia; Rikard, RR.V. & Coleman, LaToya O. (2016) “Invaluable values: an expectancy-value theory analysis of youths’ academic motivations and intentions”, Information, Communication & Society, 19:5, pp. 618-638, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1139616
3. Bragg, D.(2001) “The New Vocationalism in Community Colleges.” New Directions for Community Colleges, Vol. 115, pp.5–15.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.)(2000), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
5. Cook, L., Friend, M., (1995) “Co-Teaching: Guidelines for Creating Effective Practices”, Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3): 1-16.
6. Dieker, L., Murawski, W. (2003). “Co-teaching at the secondary level: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions for success”, The High School Journal, 86: 1-13.
7. Elizabeth B. Keefe, Veronica Moore, Frances Duff (2004) “The Four “Knows” of Collaborative Teaching”TEACHING Exceptional Children,Vol 36, Issue 5, pp. 36 -42.First Published May 1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990403600505
8. Emily C. Bouck (2010) ,“Co-Teaching … Not Just a Textbook Term: Implications for Practice”, Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 51:2, pp.46-51, DOI: 10.3200/PSFL.51.2.46-51
9. Esen Ersoya & Neş’eBaşer (2013) “The Effects of Problem-based Learning Method in Higher Education on Creative Thinking” Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 116, 21 February 2014, Pages 3494-3498,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.790Get rights and content
10. Gately, S. E., Gately, F. J. (2001). “Understanding Co-teaching Components”. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4): 40-47.
11. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M.(1999), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications, 1999.
12. Henderson, Amy (2017) “Leveraging the power of experiential learning to achieve higher-order proficiencies”, The Journal of Economic Education, 49:1, pp:59-71, DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1397576
13. Hernández-Serrano,Julián; Stefanou,Spiro E.; Hood,Lamartine F.; Zoumas, Barry L. (2002), “Using experts’ experiences through stories in teaching new product development”, Journal of Product Innovation Management,Volume 19, Issue 1, pp. 54-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00118-7
14. Hilary Cremin, Edward Sellman & Gillean McCluskey (2012), “Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restorative Justice: Developing Insights for Education”, British Journal of Educational Studies, 60:4, pp.421-437, DOI:10.1080/00071005.2012.738290
15. Jang, S. (2006), “Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers”. Educational Research, 48(2): 177-194.
16. Jean Henscheid, Michael O’Rourke, and Gary Williams (2009),“Embedding the Humanities in Cross-Disciplinary General Education Courses”,The Journal of General Education, Volume 58, Number 4, 2009, pp. 279-295 | 10.1353/jge.0.0052
17. Kernan, A. (Ed.). (1997). What’s happened to the humanities? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Marilyn Friend, Monica Reising & Lynne Cook (2010) “Co-Teaching: An Overview of the Past, a Glimpse at the Present, and Considerations for the Future”, Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 37:4, 6-10, DOI: 10.1080/1045988X.1993.9944611
19. McClenney, K. M. “Keeping America’s Promises: Challenges for Community Colleges.” In K. Boswell and C. D. Wilson (eds.), Denver: Education Commission of the States and League for Innovation in the Community College, Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO.
20. Mok, Ka-Ho (2010), “Reflecting globalization effects on local policy: higher education reform in Taiwan”, Journal of Education Policy, 15:6, pp.637-660, DOI: 10.1080/02680930010000236
21. Readings, Bill (1996), The university in ruins, Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1996
22. Shin, J.C. & Harman, G.,(2009) “New challenges for higher education: global and Asia-Pacific perspectives”, Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 10: 1. pp1-13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9011-6
23. Sung, Su-mei (2017) “ The Universities Become More while Students Are Getting Less?A System Analysis of the Taiwanese Higher Education Crisis”, National Taipei University Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations:An International Journal Vol. 3, No. 3, Dec. 2017, pp. 1361-1394.
24. Van Garderen, D., Stormont, M. and Goel, N. (2012). “Collaboration between general and special educators and student outcomes: A need for more research”, Psychology in the Schools, 49(5). Retrieved April 20, 2018 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/pits.21610/full
