研究資料首頁-> 研討會論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | 影響台灣碳排放量因素探究 |
| 研討會開始日期 | 2017-06-17 |
| 研討會結束日期 | 2017-06-18 |
| 所有作者 | 曹淑琳 |
| 作者順序 | 第一作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 是 |
| 研討會名稱 | GETM 2017 conference |
| 是否具有對外公開徵稿及審稿制度 | 是 |
| 研討會舉行之國家 | NATTWN-中華民國 |
| 研討會舉行之城市 | 彰化 |
| 發表年份 | 2017 |
| 所屬計劃案 | 文藻專題研究計畫 |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 附件 |
影響台灣碳排放量減排因素之探究.docx
|
[摘要] :
2015年有150個國家政府領袖與代表聚首巴黎氣候峰會，尋求達成全球氣候協議。在此峰會中，「碳金融」與「碳價格化」是兩大焦點。要研究「碳金融」與「碳價格化」兩大與碳排放量的相關議題，需要先估算碳排放量。本文蒐集台灣中央政府、地方政府及不同行業的能源消費特性及統計數據，利用碳排放的完全指數分解方法－對數平均Divisia指數(LMDI法)，分析探討我國從2000年-2015年碳排放變化的影響因素，提供政府相關的產業政策及能源發展政策之參考。
[英文摘要] :
There are 150 states leaders and representatives gathered in Paris on “2015 Climate Summit” for seeking to reach a global climate agreement. ”Carbon Finance” and “Carbon Price” are the two mainissues inthisclimate summit. Evaluation of Carbon Emissions is the key and essential to complete “Carbon Finance”and “Carbon Price”mechanism.This project plans to providean evaluation methods of CO2 emissions at different levels in terms of different properties of energy consumption and available statistical data at national,local and industrial levels. The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index Method (LMDI),which is the completeddecomposition of carbon emissionswith the decomposition residual item of zero, was used to perform quantitative analysis of changes in CO2 emissions and percentages of contributors for Taiwan during the period 2000-2015.The conclusions would be helpful for formulating industrial policies and energy development measurement in the future.
[參考文獻] :
1. ACCA,2010, The Association of Chartered Certified Accountant Research report 122, 【Accounting for Carbon】. London.
2. Brophy,M & Starkey, R,1996,In.R.Welford(ED),Environmental Management-systems and strategies, ch 10:175-176, Eartjstan Publications Led, 【Environmental Reporting】 London.
3. Cox R., 2001.Tough Environmental Regulations Bring New Opportunities for CPA’s.【 Pennsylvania CPA Journal】, 72(2), 16-18.
4. Cormier, D., and I. M. Gordon. 2001. An Examination of Social and Environmental Reporting Strategies. 【Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal】, 14(5): 587-617.
5. Cairns, R. D., and Lasserre, P,2006. Implementing carbon credits for forests based on greenaccounting. 【Ecological Economics】, 56(4), 610-621
6. Environment Agency. 2002. Environment Agency-Environmental Accounting Annual Report. Bristol, UK：【Environment Agency】.
7. Ertimur, Y., Jennifer Francis, Amanda Gonzales and Katherine Schipper 2010, Financial Reporting for Cap-and-Trade Emissions Reduction Programs,【 Working Paper】, Duke University.
8. International Federation of Accounts（IFAC），http://www.ifac.org/
9. Johnston, D.M., Stephan E. Sefcik and Naomi S. Soderstorm ,2008, ,The value relevance of greenhouse as emissions allowances an exploratory study in the related united states SO2 Market, 【European Accounting Review】 17(4),pp.747-764.
10. Ingram, R.W., & K.B.Frazier,1980,Environmental performance and corporate disclosure, 【Journal of Accounting Research】 18(2):pp614-622.
11. IFRIC (2004), IFRIC 3, Emission rights. London : International Accounting Standards Board.
12. Hopofenbeck, M &Wademar, S, 1993,【The green management revolution : Lessons in environmental excellence】, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
13. Lennart. Y.Ljungberg, 2007,【Materials selection and design for development of sustainable reducts】,Materials and Design, vol. 28. No 2,pp466-479.
14. Ministry of the Environment JAPAN. 2005.【 Environmental Accounting Guidelines】. Tokyo, Japan.
15. Porter E. Michael, 1980. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. 【Competitive Strategy】N.Y : Free Press.
16. PwC and IETA ,2007, Trouble-Entry Accounting-Revisited : Uncertainty in accounting for the EU emissions trading scheme and certified emission reductions
17. Stefan Schaltegger,2000, Roger Burritt, Contemporary Environmental Accounting : Issues, Concepts and Practice, 【Green leaf Publishing Limited】.
18. Toms, J. S. 2002. Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: some UK evidence. 【British Accounting Review 】(34): 257-282.
19. Veith, S.,Jorg R. Werner and Jochen Zimmermann,2009, ,Competing Accounting Treatments for Emission Rights A Capital Market Perspective, “Competing Accounting Treatments for Emission Rights A Capital Market Perspective.”【 Energy Economics】, 31(4),pp.605-613
20. Williams, S.M, 1999,【International Journal of Accounting】,Voluntary environmental and social accounting disclosure practices in the Asia-Pacific regin, 34(2),pp209-238.
21. Dunk A. S.2002,product quality ,Environmental Accounting and Qualityperformance ,【Accounting, Auditing &Accountability Journal】 Vol.15 P713-732
22. Japan,2000,Developing an Environmental Accounting system-2000 Report”，Study Group for Developing a System for Environmental Accounting Environment Agency，March 2000
23. 丁祖榮，2008，【溫室氣體限排:地球生命的防線】，生態環境，第17期第三卷，pp1290-1295。
24. 張宇樑，吳蓿椒，2007，【研究設計:質化、量化與混合方法取向】，學富台北，台北。
25. 陳巧芬、郭振雄、何怡澄、林良楓，2013，總量管制交易之財務會計制度的建置與評估，【財稅研究】，第43卷，第3期，pp160-186。
26. 陳向明，2002，社會科學質的研究，台北，五南出版社。
27. 陳玲慧，2011，節能減碳風潮下企業責任與契機。【節能減碳時代企業的創新思維研討會】。
28. 榮泰生，2003，【企業研究方法】，台北，五南文化
29. 簡又新，2011，低碳經濟時代企業永續發展的挑戰與機會，【節能減碳時代企業的創新思維研討會】。
