研究資料首頁-> 研討會論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | The Relationship among Attainment Discrepancy, Slack and Innovation Commitment: The moderating role of strategic frames |
| 研討會開始日期 | 2011-08-12 |
| 研討會結束日期 | 2011-08-16 |
| 所有作者 | Chen-Yi Tsai, Julia L. Lin, Shih-Chieh Fang |
| 作者順序 | 第一作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 是 |
| 研討會名稱 | 2011 AOM Annual Meeting |
| 是否具有對外公開徵稿及審稿制度 | 是 |
| 研討會舉行之國家 | NATUSA-美國 |
| 研討會舉行之城市 | san antonio |
| 發表年份 | 2011 |
| 所屬計劃案 | 無 |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 | |
| 可公開文檔 |
[摘要] :
We argued that strategic frames are critical source of attention that channels strategy formulations. This study incorporated Managerial and Organizational Cognitive perspective into The Behavioral Theory of the Firm and suggested managerial cognition as boundary condition of performance feedback model. The cognition perspective is used to complement problemistic and slack search in examining how CEO’s strategic frames affect strategic decision when firms experience poor performance. In the context of high-tech industry and longitudinal data throughout East Financial Crisis (1997) to World Economic Crisis (2008), panel tests on data from firms in Taiwan support our hypotheses overall. Strategic frames of CEOs are important in understanding firm’s search behavior and adaptation strategies in time of economic adversity. Theoretical implications and future research directions are discussed.
Keywords: BTOF, Innovation, Strategic Frame, Content Analysis
[英文摘要] :
We argued that strategic frames are critical source of attention that channels strategy formulations. This study incorporated Managerial and Organizational Cognitive perspective into The Behavioral Theory of the Firm and suggested managerial cognition as boundary condition of performance feedback model. The cognition perspective is used to complement problemistic and slack search in examining how CEO’s strategic frames affect strategic decision when firms experience poor performance. In the context of high-tech industry and longitudinal data throughout East Financial Crisis (1997) to World Economic Crisis (2008), panel tests on data from firms in Taiwan support our hypotheses overall. Strategic frames of CEOs are important in understanding firm’s search behavior and adaptation strategies in time of economic adversity. Theoretical implications and future research directions are discussed.
Keywords: BTOF, Innovation, Strategic Frame, Content Analysis
[參考文獻] :
Audia, P. G., & Greve, H. R. 2006. Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science, 52(1): 83-94.
Barr, P. S. 1998. Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and Its role in strategic change. Organization science, 9(6): 644-669.
Bourgeois III, L. J. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 29-39.
Chen, W.-R. 2008. Determinants of firms' Backward- and Forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organization Science, 19(4): 609-622.
Chen, W.-R., & Miller, K. 2007. Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 369-381.
Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. 2006. Attention as the mediator between Top Management Team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4): 453-469.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A Behavior Theory of the Firm: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Desai, V. M. 2008. Constrained growth: How experience, legitimacy, and age influence risk taking in organizations. Organization Science, 19(4): 594-608.
Desai, V. M. 2010. Rule Violations and Organizational Search: A Review and Extension. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2): 184-200.
Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. 2007. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1): 5-34.
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. 2008. Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science, 20(2): 461–477.
Fiss, P. G. 2011. Building better causal theories: A puzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 393-420.
Greve, H. R. 2003a. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovation: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 685-702.
Greve, H. R. 2003b. Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Industrial & Corporate Change, 12: 1501 - 1076.
Kabanoff, B., & Brown, S. 2008. Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders: content, structure, stability, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2): 149-171.
Kaplan, S. 2008. Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the Fiber-Optic revolution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4): 672-695.
Kaplan, S. 2011. Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3): 665-695.
Kaplan, S., & Henderson, R. 2005. Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organization Science, 16(8): 509-521.
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodlogy (2nd). London: Sage Publication.
Lehman, D. W., Hahn, J., Ramanujam, R., & Alge, B. J. 2011. The dynamics of the performance-risk relationship within a performance period: The moderating role of deadline proximity. Organization Science: orsc.1100.0626.
Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. 1981. A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4): 307-333.
MacClelland, P., Liang, X., & Barker, V. L. 2009. CEO commitment to the status quo: Replication and extension using content analysis. Journal of Management, 36(5): 1251-1277.
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. 1992. Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review, 99(1): 172-183.
McClelland, P. L., Xin Liang, & Barker, V. L. 2010. CEO Commitment to the Status Quo: Replication and Extension Using Content Analysis. Journal of Management, 36(5): 1251-1277.
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. 2003. Organiztional Strategy, Structure, and Process. California: Stanford University Press.
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J., Jr. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 546-562.
Miller, K. D., & Chen, W.-R. 2004. Variable organizational risk preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira model. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1): 105-115.
Morris, R. 1994. Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations. Journal of Management, 20(4): 903-931.
Mowery, D. C. 2009. Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the "third industrial revolution". Ind Corp Change, 18(1): 1-50.
Narayanan, V. K., Zane, L. J., & Kemmerer, B. 2011. The cognitive perspective in strategy: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 37(1): 305-351.
Ocasio, W. 1997. Toward an Attention-Based View of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187-206.
Ocasio, W. in press. Attention to attention. Organization Science: 11.
Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. 2008. The application of DICTION to content analysis research in Strategic Management. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4): 727-752.
Suarez, F. F., & Oliva, R. 2005. Environmental change and organizational transformation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6): 1017-1041.
Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. 2003. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1249-1263.
Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. 2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2): 221-231.
Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. 2008. The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1): 147-164.
Walsh, j. p. 1995. Managerial and orgniational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6: 280-321.
