文藻外語大學W-Portfolio

簡赫琳的國際政治天地

研究資料首頁-> 研討會論文

研究資料明細

論文名稱 “Natural Disaster as Focusing Event in Policy Change:
研討會開始日期 2012-07-09
研討會結束日期 2013-07-05
所有作者 Herlin Chien
作者順序 第一作者
通訊作者
研討會名稱 7th International Conference in Interpretive Policy Analysis: Understanding the Drama of Democracy. Policy Work, Power and Transformation
是否具有對外公開徵稿及審稿制度
研討會舉行之國家 NATNLD-荷蘭王國
研討會舉行之城市 Tilburg
發表年份 2012
所屬計劃案
可公開文檔  
可公開文檔   
可公開文檔   


[英文摘要] :
Many scholars argue that a crisis can serve as a catalyst to prompt a previously controversial policy change. However, many of the effects of a crisis on policy changes or policy intractability remain uninvestigated. Do policy-makers in different countries react similarly or differently to the same crisis? This paper uses a narrative policy analysis to conduct comparative case studies to examine how the Fukushima nuclear explosion affected nuclear energy policies in different polities. Six cases are selected: the United States, France, India, Switzerland, Taiwan and Italy. Whereas the first three countries listed do not exhibit nuclear policy changes in the post-crisis landscape, the latter three have experienced a policy reversal.
Keywords: crisis, policy change, policy learning, nuclear energy policy, narrative policy analysis (NPA)

[參考文獻] :
Bibliography
Baumgartner, F., 1989, Independent and Politicized Policy Communities: Education and Nuclear Energy in France and in the United States. Governance, 2 ,1, 42-66.
Baumgartner, F., 2009, Uncovering Deterministic Causal Structures: A Boolean Approach. Synthese, 170, 71-96.
Bamgartner, Frank and Jones, Bryan D., 1993, Agenda and Instability in American Politics. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Bennett, Colin and Howlett, Michael, 1992, The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275-94.
Boin, Arjen, 'tHart, Paul and McConnell, Allan, 2009, Crisis Exploitation: Political and Policy Impacts of Framing Contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 81-106.
Burnett, M. and Davis, C., 2002, Getting Out the Cut: Politics and National Forest Timber Harvests, 1960-1995. Administration and Society, 34, 2, 202-228.
Birkland, T. A., 1998, Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18,1, 53-74.
Birkland, T. A., 2006, Lessons of Disaster: Policy After Catastrophic Events (Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press).
Cobb, Roger and Elder, Charles D., 1983, Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building (2nd ed.) (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press).
Corbin, T. B., 2010, Policy Entrepreneurs and Focusing Events: Congressional Agenda Setting after Hurricane Katrina (Claremont: The Claremont Graduate University).
Fink, S., 1986, Crisis Management: Planning for the Inevitable (New York: American Mangement Association).
Fischer, Frank and Forrester, John, 1993, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
Glaser, B., 1992, Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence versus Forcing (Chicago: Aldine).
Glaser, B., 1978, Theoretical Sensitivity (Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press).
Glaser, B. and Strauss, Anselm L., 1965, Discovery of Substantive Theory: A Basic Strategy Underlying Qualitatie Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 8, 5-12.
Godwin M. and Schroedel, J., 2000, Policy Diffusion and Strategies for Promoting Policy Change: Evidence from california Local Gun Control Ordinances. Policy Studies Journal, 28,4, 760-776.
Hajer, M., 1993, Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice: The Case of Acid Rain in Great Britain, in: J. F. Frank Fischer (Eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), pp. 43-76
Hall, P., 1993, Policy Paradigms, Social learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275-96.
Hansen, K and Krejci, D., 2000, Rethinking Neoinstitutional Interaction :Municipal Arena-Specific Strategies and teh Base Closure Process. Administration and Society, 32,2, 166-182.
Hoberg, G., 1996, Putting Ideas in Their Place: A response to "Learning and Change in the British Columbia Forest Policy Sector". Canadian Journal of Political Science, 29, 135-144.
James, Thomas E. and Jorgensen, Paul D., 2009, Policy Knowledge, Policy Formulation, and Change: Revisiting a Foundational Question. The Policy Studies, 37,1, 141-162.
Kingdon, J. W., 1984, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy (Boston, MA: Little Brown).
Kingdon, J. W., 1995, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Addison, New York: Wesley Longman).
Kurtz, R. S., 2004, Coastal Oil Pollution: Spills, Crisis, and Policy Change. Review of Policy Research, 21,2, 201-219.
Latour, Bruno, 1999, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Lertzman, Ken, Rayner, Jeremy and Wilson, Jeremy,1996, Learning and Change in the British Columbia Forest Policy Sector: A Consideration of Sabatier's Advocacy Coalition Framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 22, 111-133.
Levi, Michael and Wall, David S., 2004, Technologies, Security, and Privacy in the Post-9/11 European Information Society. Journal of Law and Society, 31,2, 197-220.
Light, P., 1982, The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter (with Notes on Ronald Reagan) (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University).
McBeth, Mark K., Shanahan, Elizabeth, Arnell, A., Ruth J, Hathaway, Paul L., 2007, The Intersection of Narrative Policy Analysis and Policy Change Theory. The Policy Studies Journal, 35,1, 87-108.
Mintrom, Michael and Vergari, Sandra, 2005, Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal, 24,3, 420-434.
Mintrom, Michael and Vergari, Sandra., 1996, Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change. Policy Studies Journal, 24,3, 420-34.
Nohrstedt, D., 2008, The Politics of Crisis Policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 36,2, 257-278.
Nohrstedt, Daniel and Weible, Christopher M., 2010, The Logic of Policy Change after Crisis: Proximity and Subsystem Interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1,2. 1-32.
Nudell, M. and Anthokol, N., 1988, The Handook for Effective Emergency and Crisis Management (Toronto: Lexington).
Pauchant, T. C and Mitroff, I. I., 1992, The Crisis-Prone Organization: Diagnostic and Intervention (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
Pralle, S. B., 2003, Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy. Journal of Public Policy, 23,3, 233-260.
Radaelli, C., 1999, Harmful Tax Competition in the EU: Policy Narratives and Advocacy Coalitions. Journal of Market Studies, 37, 661-682.
Ragin, C.C., 2000, Fuzzy-Set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Ragin, C.C., 2008, Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Ragin, C.C., 1987, The Comparative Method (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Raphael, B., 1986, When Disaster Strikes: A Handbook for the Helping Professions ( London: Hutchinson).
Roe, E., 1994, Narrative Policy Analysis (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
Sabatier, P., 2000, Clear Enough to Be Wrong. Journal of European Pulic Policy, 7, 134-40.
Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
Schneider, Anne and Ingram, Helen M., 2005, Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy (Albany: State University of New York Press).
Smith, D., 1974, The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44,4, 257-268.
Stone, D., 2002, Policy Paradox: The Art of Policial Decision Making (revised ed.) (New York: W.W. Norton).
Strauss, A., 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press).
Staw, Barry M., Sandelands, Lance E. and Dutton, Jane E., 1981, Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26,4, 501-524.
't Hart, P., 1993, Symbols, Rituals and Power: The Lost Dimensions of Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1,1, 36-50.
't Hart, Paul and Boin, Arjen, 2001, Between Crisis and Nornalcy: The Long Shadow of Post-Crisis Politics, in: A. B. Uriel Rosenthal (Eds) Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities, (Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas), pp. 28-46.
Walgrave, Stefaan and Varone, Frederic, 2008, Punctuated Equilibrium and Agenda-Setting: Bringing Parties Back in: Policy Change after the Dutroux Crisis in Belgium. Governance, 21,3, 365-395.
Walker, J. L., 1977. Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection. British Journal of Political Science, 7, 423-445.
Weible, C. M., 2008, Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis, The Policy Studies Journal, 36,4, 615-635.
Woodward, J., 2003, Making Things Happen (Oxford: Oxford University Press).