研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | Policy Change or Policy Intractability in Post-Crisis Landscape? The Fukushima Explosion and Comparative Nuclear Energy Policy |
| 發表日期 | 2013-06-01 |
| 論文收錄分類 | TSSCI |
| 所有作者 | 簡赫琳 |
| 作者順序 | 第一作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 是 |
| 刊物名稱 | 行政暨政策學報 |
| 發表卷數 | 56 |
| 是否具有審稿制度 | 是 |
| 發表期數 | |
| 期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 | NATTWN-中華民國 |
| 發表年份 | 2013 |
| 發表月份 | 6 |
| 發表形式 | 紙本及電子期刊 |
| 所屬計劃案 | 無 |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
[摘要] :
許多學者研究發現，災變是許多爭議性高之政策變遷的催化劑，但除此之
外，災變究竟如何影響政策制訂方向還未被仔細檢驗，例如：不同國家之政策制
定者面對相同的災變，其政策回應到底是相同還是不同？本研究使用敘事政策分
析法（NPA）來比較多國在2011 年福島核災後核能政策走向的相異，共有六國在
本研究中被分析：美國、法國、印度、瑞士、台灣與義大利，前三國在災後並沒
有顯著核能政策變遷，後三國則在災後經歷核能政策改變。
此研究發現，災變並不總像過去研究發現的必為政策帶來變遷，許多政策縱
使在經過災變後仍是停滯，政策學習也不一定是必然。
[英文摘要] :
Many scholars argue that a crisis can serve as a catalyst to prompt a previously
controversial policy change. However, many of the effects of a crisis on policy changes
or policy intractability remain uninvestigated. Do policy-makers in different countries
react similarly or differently to the same crisis? This paper uses a narrative policy
analysis to conduct comparative case studies to examine how the 2011 Fukushima
nuclear explosion affected nuclear energy policies in different polities. Six cases are
selected: the United States, France, India, Switzerland, Taiwan and Italy. Whereas the
first three countries listed do not exhibit nuclear policy changes in the post-crisis
landscape, the latter three have experienced a policy reversal.
This research finds that crises do not always serve as a catalyst to induce policy
changes as conventional wisdom predicts. Many policies exhibit its intractability even
after a major crisis whereas policy learning is not automatic neither.
