研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | What’s in a word? The framing of health at the regional level: ASEAN, EU, SADC and UNASUR |
| 發表日期 | 2015-09-25 |
| 論文收錄分類 | 其他 |
| 所有作者 | A.B Amaya, V. Rollet, S. Kingah |
| 作者順序 | 第二作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 否 |
| 刊物名稱 | Global Social Policy |
| 發表卷數 | 1-28 |
| 是否具有審稿制度 | 是 |
| 發表期數 | |
| 期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 | NATGBR-英國 |
| 發表年份 | 2015 |
| 發表月份 | 9 |
| 發表形式 | 紙本 |
| 所屬計劃案 | - |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
[摘要] :
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the European Union, the Southern African Development Community and the Union of South American Nations have increasingly been involved in health diplomacy in the past decade, yet little is known about how they frame health as a foreign policy issue and how this has an impact on their prioritisation of policies. For this, we conducted a review of existing grey and peer-reviewed literature that address regional integration and health, as well as a documentary review according to security, development, trade, human rights, moral/ethical reasonings and global public goods frames identified in the literature. The policy frames identified responded to the challenges these regions currently face. The Association of Southeast Asian Nation’s struggle with re-emerging diseases has led to favouring a securitisation approach to health, the European Union approaches health as a cross-cutting policy issue, the Southern African Development Community presents health as a driver for development, and while the Union of South American Nations emphasises health as a human right and addresses the social determinants of health as an ethical imperative. Overall, these policy frames were useful in analysing the framing of health in foreign policy at the regional level. However, within our analysis, we identified a new frame that approaches health as an intersectoral issue. The impact of regional organisations’ forward will depend on their ability to harness their convening power and speak in a coherent voice on health matters.
[英文摘要] :
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the European Union, the Southern African Development Community and the Union of South American Nations have increasingly been involved in health diplomacy in the past decade, yet little is known about how they frame health as a foreign policy issue and how this has an impact on their prioritisation of policies. For this, we conducted a review of existing grey and peer-reviewed literature that address regional integration and health, as well as a documentary review according to security, development, trade, human rights, moral/ethical reasonings and global public goods frames identified in the literature. The policy frames identified responded to the challenges these regions currently face. The Association of Southeast Asian Nation’s struggle with re-emerging diseases has led to favouring a securitisation approach to health, the European Union approaches health as a cross-cutting policy issue, the Southern African Development Community presents health as a driver for development, and while the Union of South American Nations emphasises health as a human right and addresses the social determinants of health as an ethical imperative. Overall, these policy frames were useful in analysing the framing of health in foreign policy at the regional level. However, within our analysis, we identified a new frame that approaches health as an intersectoral issue. The impact of regional organisations’ forward will depend on their ability to harness their convening power and speak in a coherent voice on health matters.
