研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | EFL university student writers’ perceptions of a genre-based writing textbook |
| 發表日期 | 2015-11-30 |
| 論文收錄分類 | 其他 |
| 所有作者 | Antonia Hsiu-chen LIN、Chun-Ching HSIEH |
| 作者順序 | 第一作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 是 |
| 刊物名稱 | 英語教育期刊 |
| 發表卷數 | 4 |
| 是否具有審稿制度 | 是 |
| 發表期數 | 1 |
| 期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 | NATTWN-中華民國 |
| 發表年份 | 2015 |
| 發表月份 | 11 |
| 發表形式 | 紙本 |
| 所屬計劃案 | 無 |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
[摘要] :
大學生對文體寫作教科書的看法
摘要
過程寫作教學在台灣已歷行多年，但多數學生仍對寫作心存畏懼。而文體寫作教學提供認知及語言發展的整合性學習，並透過學習週期，引導學生瞭解寫作方法與內容。本研究採問卷方式，探討365名大一及大二學生對文體寫作教科書的看法。問卷包括三部份：(一)對該教材的整體印象與內容的看法(21)；(二)學生對此教科書的評估(15題); (三)簡答題(1)。共回收有效問卷305份。結果顯示大一學生對此教科書運用於寫作課程，給予較多正面回應。本文也針對學生的反應提出教學建議，以利日後教師教學研究及書商改版之參考。
關鍵字: 英文作為外國語，看法，文體，範文，教科書評量
[英文摘要] :
ABSTRACT
The process-based approach has dominated in writing instruction in Taiwan. Nevertheless, many students still show apprehension in writing. Alternatively, the genre-based approach provides students with cognitive and linguistic development in learning how and what to write with the stages of learning cycle. This study aims to investigate a group of university students’ perceptions of a genre-based writing textbook written with the EFL learners as the target users. A teacher-designed questionnaire was conducted to 365 freshmen and sophomores, and 305 responses were collected. Involved in the questionnaire were three parts: one with 21 items relating to general impression and taught content, another with 15 items relating to the use of the writing book, and the other an open-ended question. Overall, findings revealed that participating freshmen appeared to show more positive feedback compared to sophomores. In response to the feedback, some pedagogical suggestions were also proposed for further study.
Keywords: EFL, perceptions, genre, textbook evaluation
[參考文獻] :
REFERENCES
Atkinson, D., & Ramanathan, V. (1995). Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/language programs. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 539-568.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
Bhatia, V. K. (1998). Generic conflicts in academic discourse. In I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J. C. Palmer, & J. F. Coll (Eds.), Genre studies in English for academic purposes (pp. 15-28). Castello de la Plana: Publicacions de al Universitat Jaume.
Bhatia, V. K. (1999). Integrating products, processes, and participants in professional writing. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 21-39). London: Longman.
Bruce, I. J. (2003). Cognitive genre prototype modelling and its implications for the teaching of academic writing to learners of English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Crombie, W., & Johnson, D. (2004). Genre and text-type: Putting discourses together. Languages, Literary Studies and International Studies, 1, 143-175.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.
Dendrinos, B. (1992). The EFL textbook and ideology. Greece: N. C. Grivas Publications.
Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Primary English Teaching Associates.
Derewianka, B. (1994). Exploring how texts work. Victoria, (Australia): Australian Print Group.
Ellis, R. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.) Materials development in language teaching (pp. 217-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fujioka, M. (2001). Asian students’ English writing experience. Proceedings of the 27th Annual JALT Conference, 185-194.
Grant, M. (1987). Making the most of your textbook. London: Longman.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hirose, K. (1998). The effects of English paragraph writing instruction on Japanese university students. JACEL Bulletin, 29, 51-64.
Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-328.
Hycroft, J. (1998). An introduction to English language teaching. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113-135.
Hyland, K. (2003a). Genre-centered pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29.
Hyland, K. (2003b). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Johns, A. M. (1990). L1 composition theories: Implications for developing theories of L2 composition. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 24-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, D., & Crombie, W. (2010). A genre-based approach to academic writing. Taipei: Tunghua Books.
Lemke, J. L. (1994, November). Genre as a strategic resource. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English. Orlando, FL. Retrieved on 20 August, 2008. http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/ content_storage_01/0000019b/803/7f/8e.pdf
Mares, C. (2003). Writing a coursebook. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 130-140). London: Continuum.
Odell, L. (1980). Teaching writing by teaching the process of discovery: An interdisciplinary enterprise. In L. W. Gregg & E. R Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 139-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reppen, R. (2002). A genre-based approach to content writing instruction. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya, Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 321-327). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics. Essex: Pearson Education.
Sheldon, L. (1987). ELT textbooks and materials: Problems in evaluation and development. London: Modern English Pubs and British Council.
Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives. Educational Research and Review 5(9), 508-517.
Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language learning materials: A critical review. London: Continuum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, W. P. (2008). Teaching English to young learners in Taiwan: Issues relating to teaching, teacher education, teaching materials and teacher perspectives. PhD thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved September 30, 2014 from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/
handle/10289/2547/thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Watson-Reekie, C. (1984). The use and abuse of models in the ESL writing class. In S. McKay (Ed.), Composing in a second language (97–109). Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers.
Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case-studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-187.
