研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文
研究資料明細
| 論文名稱 | Evaluating genre-based writing instruction: Materials, instructional mode and student learning styles |
| 發表日期 | 2016-06-01 |
| 論文收錄分類 | 其他 |
| 所有作者 | Diane Johnson; Hsiu-Chen (Antonia) Lin |
| 作者順序 | 第二作者 |
| 通訊作者 | 否 |
| 刊物名稱 | The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly |
| 發表卷數 | Volume 18 |
| 是否具有審稿制度 | 是 |
| 發表期數 | Issue 2 |
| 期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 | NATPHL-菲律賓共和國 |
| 發表年份 | 2016 |
| 發表月份 | 6 |
| 發表形式 | 電子期刊 |
| 所屬計劃案 | 無 |
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
| 可公開文檔 |
|
[英文摘要] :
completed a pre-course learning styles inventory and, following the course, responded to a course questionnaire. A number of students also participated in a follow-up focus-group discussion. A comparison of pre-test and post-test writing task scores indicated improvement in all assessed areas and questionnaire responses and informal feedback indicated a high level of satisfaction with the course. Face-to-face and blended mode group participants were the most positive about the course but the writing performance of the online mode group showed the greatest improvement. There was no detectable relationship between learning styles and learning mode preferences.
Keywords: EFL academic writing, computer-mediated writing instruction, genre-centered writing instruction, cognitive genre
[參考文獻] :
Adams, M. J. (1991). Why not phonics and whole language. In W. Ellis (ed.), All language and the creation of literacy (pp. 40-53). Baltimore, MA: The Orton Dyslexia Society.
Applebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (eds.), The teaching of writing (pp. 95-113). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arndt, V. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT Journal, 41(4). 257-267.
Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 3-15.
Atkinson, D., & Ramanathan, V. (1995). Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/ language programs. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 539-568.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
Bazermann, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor and Francis.
Bhatia, V. K. (1998). Generic conflicts in academic discourse. In I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J. C. Palmer, & J. F. Coll (eds.), Genre studies in English for academic purposes (pp. 15-28). Castello de la Plana: Publicacions de al Universitat Jaume.
Biber, D. (1989). A Typology of English text. Linguistics, 27, 3-43.
Bizzell, P. (1986). Composing processes: An overview. In A. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (eds.), The teaching of writing (pp. 49-70). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Braddock, R., Lloyd-Jones, R. & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Bruce, I. (2003). Cognitive genre prototype modelling and its implications for the teaching of academic writing to learners of English as a second language. PhD thesis. New Zealand: University of Waikato.
Caudery, T. (1995). What the “process approach” means to practicing teachers of second language writing skills. TESL-EJ, 1(4), 1-11. Retrieved Feb 25, 2014, from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/past-issues/volume1/ej04/ej04a3/
Cambourne, B. (1988). The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. Auckland, NZ: Ashton Scholastic.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z. & thurrell, S. (1997). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching? TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 141-152.
Crombie, W. & Johnson, D. (2004). Genre and text-type: putting discourses together. Languages, Literary Studies and International Studies: An international Journal, 1, 143-176.
Crombie, W. & Johnson, D. (2009a). Writing texts in English: A guide for intermediate and advanced learners. Taichung, Taiwan: Ting Lung.
Crombie, W. & Johnson, D. (2009b). The Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages 36 credit English program: Issues and recommendations. Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Wenzao Ursuline College of Languages.
Cronbach, L.J. & Snow R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington.
Derewianka, B. (1994). Exploring how texts work. Victoria, (Australia): Australian Print Group.
DfEE (1998). The National Literacy Strategy Framework. London: Department of Education and Employment.
Dixon, J. (1967). Growth through English: A report based on the Dartmouth Seminar 1966. London: National Association of Teachers of English.
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Emig, J. (1983). The web of meaning: Essays on writing, teaching, learning, and thinking. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Entwistle, N.J. (1988). Styles of learning and teaching. London: David Fulton.
Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: A critique and proposal. College English, 48(6), 527-542.
Flower, L. & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
Fogarty, D. (1959). Roots for a new rhetoric. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Gao, Jiajing. (2007). Teaching writing in Chinese universities: Finding an eclectic approach. Asian EFL Journal, 20, Professional teaching article, Article 2. Retrieved at http://asian-efl-journal.com/teaching-articles/2007/05/05/teaching-writing-in-chinese-universities-finding-an-eclectic-approach/#thethe-tabs-1-1 25 February 2014]
Gagne,R. & Briggs, L.J. (1979). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Gould, J. D. (1980). Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In L. W. Gregg & E. R Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 97-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gough, J. (1996). Developing learning materials. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
Harris, R. J. (1962). An experimental inquiry into the functions and value of formal grammar in the teaching of English, with special reference to the teaching of correct written English to children aged twelve to fourteen. PhD thesis, London: University of London.
Hayes, J. & Allison, C.W. (1996). The implications of learning styles for training and development: A discussion of the matching hypothesis. British Journal of Management 7 (1): 63-73.
Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (eds.) Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Essex: Pearson Education.
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-centered pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29.
Johns, A. M. (1990). L1 composition theories: Implications for developing theories of L2 composition. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 24-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
Lin, B. (2006). Vygotskian principles in a genre-based approach to teaching writing. NUCB Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 8(1), 69-84. Retrieved from http://www.nucba.ac.jp/cic/pdf/njlcc081/05LIN.pdf
Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 65-83.
Miller, S. (1991). Textual carnivals: The politics of composition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Ministry of Education (New Zealand). (1994). English in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
North, S. (1987). The making of knowledge in composition. London: Heinemann.
Nystrand, M. (2006). The social and historical context for writing research. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 11-27). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Nystrand, M., Greene, S., & Wiemelt, J. (1993). Where did composition studies come from? An intellectual history. Written Communication, 10(3), 267-333.
Odell, L. (1980). Teaching writing by teaching the process of discovery: An interdisciplinary enterprise. In L. W. Gregg & E. R Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 139-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pennington, M. C., & So, S. (1993). Comparing writing process and product across two languages: A study of 6 Singaporean university student writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(1), 41-63.
Pullman, G. (1999). Stepping yet again into the same current. In T. Kent (ed.), Post-process theory: Beyond the writing-process paradigm (pp. 16-29). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Quinn, J. (1993). A taxonomy of text types for use in curriculum design. EA Journal, 11(2), 33-46.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229-258.
Rowntree, D. (1982). Educational Technology in Curriculum Development. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Reigeluth, C.M. Instructional design. What is it and why is it? In C.M. Regeluth, ed., Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status, pp3-96. Hillsdale, NJ:LEA
Riding, R.J. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles- an overview and integration. Educational Psychology 11( 3 & 4) 193-215.
Sadler, E. & Riding, R. (1999). Cognitive styles and instructional preference. Instructional Science 27, 355-371.
Schmeck, R.R. (1988). Styles and strategies of learning. London: Plenum.
Shindler, J. & Yang, H. (2004, October 24). Paragon learning style inventory:
Combinations. [Retrieved from http://www.oswego.edu/plsi/combo1.htm 25 February 2014]
Susser, B. (1993). Networks and project work: Alternative pedagogies for writing with computers. Computers and Composition, 10(3), 63-89.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tangpermpoon, T. (2008). Integrated approaches to improve students writing skills for English major students. ABAC Journal, 28(2), 1-9.
Tobin, L. (1994). Introduction: How the writing process was born – and other conversion narratives. In L. Tobin & T. Newkirk (eds.), Taking stock: The writing process movement in the ’90s (pp. 1-14). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Heinemann.
Tobin, L. (2001). Process pedagogy, In G. Tate, A. Rupiper, & K. Schick (eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 1-18). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wolff, D. (2000). Second language writing: A few remarks on psycholinguistic and instructional issues. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 107-112.
Young, R. E. (1978). Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 29-48). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case-studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-187.
