文藻外語大學W-Portfolio

研究資料首頁-> 期刊論文

研究資料明細

論文名稱 傢俱零售業網路經營決策影響因素之比較分析
發表日期 2020-09-16
論文收錄分類 其他
所有作者 曹淑琳、李宜霈、鄭詠亓、彭關婷、陳美滋
作者順序 第一作者
通訊作者
刊物名稱 全球商業經營管理學報
發表卷數  
是否具有審稿制度
發表期數 12
期刊或學報出版地國別/地區 NATTWN-中華民國
發表年份 2020
發表月份 9
發表形式 紙本及電子期刊
所屬計劃案
可公開文檔  
可公開文檔  
可公開文檔  
附件 03-S001-V1.docx03-S001-V1.docx


[摘要] :
資訊科技與網際網路的蓬勃發展,導致傢俱零售業處於日益激烈的競爭環境中。因此傢俱零售業都紛紛投入網路行銷,而傢俱零售業該如何應用網際網路,實則扮演極重要的角色。
由於傢俱零售業的廠商對於網路經營的評估準則,不是只有單一層面、單一層級,而是處理多層面之間的問題,再加上服務品質及價格促銷是無形的、不易衡量的,會有較多個人主觀因素及模糊的概念,利用精確的數值可能無法表達傢俱零售業廠商對於網路經營評估準則的認知。因此本文利用模糊理論(Fuzzy Theory)與層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP),結合成模糊層級分析法(FAHP),來反映傢俱零售業真實環境下決策分析所面臨的問題。本文訪談IKEA及特力屋,這兩家傢俱零售業的龍頭廠商相關主管,分析並且比較其網路經營決策的關鍵因素,以作為其他傢俱零售業的參考。
由研究結果發現,影響IKEA與特力屋網路經營決策的最大關鍵因素都是產品因素的「價格成本」,其次,IKEA是「網路因素」中「網頁設計」的兩項評估準則「產品資訊」和「訂單流程」;而特力屋則是「網路因素」的「客戶服務」和「安全保障」。

[英文摘要] :
The development of information technology and the Internet has brought the furniture retail industry into an increasingly competitive environment. Therefore, the furniture retail industry has invested in Internet marketing, and how to apply the Internet to the furniture retail industry actually plays a very important role.
Due to the evaluation criteria of network operations for the furniture retail industry, is not a single level, but multiple levels, plus service quality and price promotion are not easy to evaluate. Therefore, this paper combines Fuzzy Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to form a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to reflect the problems faced by the furniture retail industry. This paper interviewed the relevant leaders of IKEA and Test Rite Retail, to analyze and compare the key factors of their online business decisions, as a reference for other furniture retail industries.
The empirical results of this paper showed that the biggest key factor influencing IKEA and Test Rite Retail network management decisions is the "price cost". Secondly, for IKEA is "product information" and “Order Process”. For Test Rite Retail is “Customer Service” and “Security Guarantee”.

[參考文獻] :
1. 金屬中心(2013)。台灣傢俱實體通路演變與發展。取自https://www.slideshare.net/mirdc/2014
0814-42289529
2. 黃蕙煐(1996)。台灣物流現況與發展趨勢,物流經營管理實務,經濟部商業司。
3. 黃振嘉(1997)。電子商店經營指南,資訊與電腦,203,94-100。
4. 陳佳安(2014)。台灣家具產業現況,木工家具雜誌。取自https://www.interwood.tw/news/
news-detail.php?ID=838&ln=twzh
5. Azizi, M., Ohebbi, N., Gargari., & Ziaie, R. M. (2015). A strategic model for selecting the location of furniture factories: A case of the study of furniture. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 5(12), 87-108.
6. Bellman, R.E. & Zadeh, L.A. (1970) Decision Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Sciences, 17, 141-164.
7. Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F., Johnston, K., & Mayer, R. (2000). Internet Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice. Person Education Limited.
8. Cho, j. and Park, D. (2000). Novel Fuzzy Logic Control Based on Weighting of Partially Inconsistent Rules Using Neural Network, Journal of Intelligent &Fuzzy Systems,8(2),99-111.
9. Cross, N. (1995). The Competitive Innovator, Creativity and Annovation management, 4(3), 145-151.
10. Daniel, D. R. (1961). Management Information Crisis. In: Harvard Business Review, 39(5), 111-116.
11. Dubois, D., & Prad, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers, International Journal of System and Science,9(6).123-150.
12. Drucker., P. F. (1985). Innovation and Enterpreneurship, practice and principles. https://www.academia.edu/38623791/Innovation_and_entrepreneurship_-_Peter_F_Drucker
13. Gehrke, D. & Turban, E. (1999). Determinants of Successful Website Design:Relative Importance and Recommendations for Effectiveness. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-8.
14. Hoffman, D.L. & Novak, T.P. (1996), Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments:Conceptual Foundations, Journal of Marketing, 60,50-68.
15. Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 677–685.
16. Janal, D. S.(1995). Online marketing handbook-how to sell, advertise, publicize and promote. Your product and services on internet and commercial online systems, New York: Van Nostrand.
17. Kalakota, R., & Whinston, A. B. (1996). Frontiers of electronic commerce. Chicago: Addision-Wesley Pub.
18. IBIS World (2014). Industry Market Research, Reports & Statistics. https://www.marketresearch.com/IBISWorld-v2487/
19. Laarhoven, P. J. M. & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(3),229-241.
20. Liang, T. P. & Lai, H. J. (2001). Effect of Store Design on Consumer Purchases:on Empirical Study of on-line Bookstores, Information and Management,39(6),431-444.
21. Lohse, G. L. & Peter, S. (1998). Electronic Shopping, Association for Computer Machinery, Communications of the ACM,41(7),81-87.
22. Oblak, L., Barcuc., A. P., Klaric, K., Kuzman, M. K., Groselj, P. (2017). Evaluation of Factors in Buying Decision Process of Furniture Consumers by Applying AHP Method. Drvna Industrija,68(1),37-43.
23. Opricovic, S. & Treng, G. H. (2003). Defuzzification within a Multicriteria Decision Model. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems,11(5),635-652.
24. Rockart, J. (1979). Chief Executives Define Their Own Information Needs. In: Harvard Business Review, March/April, 81-92.
25. Saaty, T. L.(1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw – Hill, New York, 21.
26. Sandra, M. F. & Bo, S. (2003). Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping, Journal of Business Research, 56,867-875.
27. Szymamski, D.M. & Hise, R.T. (2000). E-Satisfaction:An Initial Examination, Journal of Retailing, 76(3)309-322.
28. Yesil, M. (1997). Creating the Virtual Store , New York:John Wiley and Sons , 1-13.
29. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control.8(3),338-353.
30. Zhao, R. H.& Govind, R. (1991). Defuzzification of fuzzy intervals, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 43,45-55.